<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heresy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.renovatus.com/rybee/2010/07/02/heresy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.renovatus.com/rybee/2010/07/02/heresy/</link>
	<description>Initiating a new Grassroots movement in downtown Vancouver</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:25:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JamesBrett</title>
		<link>http://www.renovatus.com/rybee/2010/07/02/heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesBrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renovatus.com/rybee/?p=1102#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>no heresy there.  good stuff.

christology, then missiology... and only then ecclesiology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no heresy there.  good stuff.</p>
<p>christology, then missiology&#8230; and only then ecclesiology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Difficult Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.renovatus.com/rybee/2010/07/02/heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-3070</link>
		<dc:creator>Difficult Questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renovatus.com/rybee/?p=1102#comment-3070</guid>
		<description>my biggest struggle I think is asking: 
 
&quot;Have we elevated the traditional 66 books of the Bible as the protestant world knows it to a place of idolatry?&quot; 
 
Was the orthodox view that won the battle of &quot;Authoritative precedence&quot; the right one?  Because if we look at Church History, as you suggest we do, then we have to recognize that the Bible in 66 book canonical form is a tradition born out of the 4th century CE.  Is claiming that all words written in this book are &quot;God&#039;s Words&quot; a reverent claim?  Or one that is blurred by our traditional views? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my biggest struggle I think is asking: </p>
<p>&quot;Have we elevated the traditional 66 books of the Bible as the protestant world knows it to a place of idolatry?&quot; </p>
<p>Was the orthodox view that won the battle of &quot;Authoritative precedence&quot; the right one?  Because if we look at Church History, as you suggest we do, then we have to recognize that the Bible in 66 book canonical form is a tradition born out of the 4th century CE.  Is claiming that all words written in this book are &quot;God&#039;s Words&quot; a reverent claim?  Or one that is blurred by our traditional views?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

